Latest updates

Briefing: Defining Nature, Peace and Security (NPS)

Narrowly interpreting the relationships between nature and security and prioritising the national security of a few risks repeating past environmental securitisation mistakes, doing little to address the drivers of biodiversity loss. This briefing explores what a more holistic approach to nature, peace and security should encompass, and offers recommendations for its development.

Logo for peace for nature: a circle is made by a hand holding an olive branch, another a long feather, text above reads peace for nature, below, nature for peace.

Nature, peace and security at COP17

As COP17 of the Convention on Biological Diversity begins in the Armenian capital Yerevan, Doug Weir considers the rising profile of nature, peace and security, and its relevance to the successful implementation of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.

A still from a projection at the UNFCCC intersessional reads "1.5 degrees C is not a number, it's a lifeline. The background comprises bright green blobs, and stars on a navy blue background.

Militaries and conflict: critical gaps in climate action

This report analyses how governments address military emissions and armed conflict impacts in UNFCCC Nationally Determined Contributions, the national climate plans that all countries have to submit to the UNFCCC. Military emissions are missing from mitigation plans, while conflict affected countries are increasingly highlighting the obstacle they pose.

2/ Three civil society networks and 35 organisations endorsed the statement. The statement was prepared by CEOBS and delivered by the brilliant Melissa Bushi, a student at @PaceUniversity, NYC.

We looked at all the national climate plans that states submit to the UNFCCC. None included plans to reduce #military emissions but more and more conflict-affected states highlight how wars are impacting their mitigation and adaptation plans https://ceobs.org/militaries-and-conflict-critical-gaps-in-climate-action #COP31

Load more

2/ Three civil society networks and 35 organisations endorsed the statement. The statement was prepared by CEOBS and delivered by the brilliant Melissa Bushi, a student at @PaceUniversity, NYC.

We looked at all the national climate plans that states submit to the UNFCCC. None included plans to reduce #military emissions but more and more conflict-affected states highlight how wars are impacting their mitigation and adaptation plans https://ceobs.org/militaries-and-conflict-critical-gaps-in-climate-action #COP31

Load more

Subscribe

Subscribe to our mailing list for news, blogs and publications.
Subscribe to mailing list

Donate

We rely on grants and private donations, please consider supporting our work through either a one off or recurring donation.
Donate

Follow us

Follow and share our work on Facebook and Twitter.
YouTubeLinkedin